NVIDIA Models
Explore all 4 models from NVIDIA with detailed pricing, pros & cons, and developer recommendations.
Quick Recommendations
Nemotron-3-Ultra
FlagshipAgentic reasoning, orchestration, complex planning
When to use: Frontier agentic workloads: multi-step planning, tool orchestration, complex reasoning chains, and production agent deployment.
Upgrade Highlights
- ◆550B MoE with 55B active — open frontier reasoning model
- ◆Hybrid Mamba-Transformer: 300+ tok/s, 1M context
- ◆Purpose-built for agentic orchestration and tool calling
- ◆Open-weight: deploy with NeMo, NIM, or self-hosted
- ◆$0.50/1M input — frontier capability at open-model pricing
Pros
- 550B total / 55B active — open frontier reasoning
- Hybrid Mamba-Transformer-MoE architecture
- 1M context for long-horizon agent tasks
- 300+ tokens/sec throughput
- Open-weight with NeMo customization
Cons
- No vision support
- 55B active params still requires significant compute for self-hosting
- Smaller ecosystem vs OpenAI/Anthropic
Performance
Multimodal
Benchmarks
Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni
LiteMultimodal agents, video/audio/image understanding, edge deployment
When to use: Multimodal AI agents needing real-time video, audio, and image understanding at the edge. Document intelligence, customer support with screen sharing, and audio-visual content analysis.
Upgrade Highlights
- ◆First NVIDIA omni-model: vision + audio + language unified
- ◆30B-A3B MoE — deploys on Jetson and DGX Spark
- ◆9x throughput: same performance, far fewer resources
- ◆Native 1080p screen reasoning for GUI agents
- ◆Open-weight: customize with NeMo for domain tasks
Pros
- Omni-modal: video + audio + image + text in one model
- 30B total / 3B active — runs on 25GB RAM
- 9x throughput vs comparable open omni-models
- Open-weight with commercial use rights
- Native 1920x1080 visual reasoning
Cons
- 3B active params limits complex reasoning
- 8K max output
- Smaller context window (256K)
Performance
Multimodal
Benchmarks
Nemotron-3-8B
Mid-tierSynthetic data generation, reward modeling
When to use: Generating synthetic training data, reward modeling for RLHF, and NVIDIA ecosystem workflows.
Upgrade Highlights
- ◆Purpose-built for synthetic data generation — train other models
- ◆Strong reward model: ranks responses better than GPT-4 judge
- ◆NVIDIA NIM deployment — optimized inference on GPUs
- ◆Fine-tuning with NeMo framework
- ◆$0.10/1M input — cost-effective for data generation at scale
Pros
- Optimized for synthetic data generation
- Strong reward model capabilities
- NVIDIA ecosystem integration
- Fine-tuning support
Cons
- 4K max output
- No vision
- Smaller model size limits complex tasks
Performance
Multimodal
Benchmarks
Nemotron-3-4B
LiteLightweight synthetic data, edge deployment
When to use: Edge deployment, lightweight synthetic data generation, and cost-sensitive batch processing.
Upgrade Highlights
- ◆4B params — deploys on Jetson and edge GPUs
- ◆Synthetic data generation at $0.05/1M input
- ◆NVIDIA NIM: optimized containerized deployment
- ◆Open-source: full weights for customization
Pros
- Compact 4B — runs on edge GPUs
- Synthetic data generation
- NVIDIA NIM optimized
- Open-source weights
Cons
- Limited reasoning capability
- 4K max output
- No vision
Performance
Multimodal
Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Model | Tier | Input | Output | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nemotron-3-Ultra | Flagship | $0.500 | $2.00 | 1M |
| Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni | Lite | $0.100 | $0.400 | 262K |
| Nemotron-3-8B | Mid-tier | $0.100 | $0.400 | 128K |
| Nemotron-3-4B | Lite | $0.050 | $0.200 | 128K |